SINLetter - August
2007
Welcome to the second
anniversary edition of Suria Investment Newsletter
(SINLetter), a free monthly investment newsletter. The
objective of this newsletter is to provide you with
unbiased initial research and basic facts about individual
stocks and other financial instruments so that you can
research them further before deciding to add them to
your portfolio or not. If you are reading this and are
not a subscriber, you can subscribe by going to www.sinletter.com/subscribe.aspx
and you will start receiving this newsletter from next
month. I have provided relevant links throughout this
newsletter, but if you have any questions or comments,
feel free to write
to me.
July
Blog Entries:
If you do not subscribe
to blog entries by email or in case you missed them,
here are the blog entries for July. Some of the comments
following a couple of these blog entries add a lot of
interesting information.
If you would like to post to the forums and do not
have your password, you can use the Request
Your Password link from the Login
page. If you do not receive blog entries by email,
you can still subscribe to receive
blog entries by email here.
Portfolio Performance:
A nearly 20% gain over
the last two days in our June
2007 pick Gymboree (GYMB)
combined with the protection offered by our put
options helped the SINLetter model portfolio close
at a record high of 103.64% since inception
and a gain of 3.14% for the month of July.
Jitters from the subprime mortgage mess spreading
into the prime area pushed most of the major indices
into negative territory in July as you can see below.
| Performance Metric |
Dow |
S&P 500 |
Nasdaq |
SINLetter |
| July 2007 |
-1.47% |
-3.2% |
-2.19% |
3.14% |
| Since Inception (Aug 2005) |
24.37% |
17.8% |
15.98% |
103.64% |
The sudden drop in the
market that we experienced last week left a lot of investors
unnerved and especially those who did not experience
the grueling bear market of 2000 to 2003 first hand.
The second ripple of the deflating housing bubble combined
with a perception that the private equity fueled acquisition
mania is finally coming
to an end is likely to lead to further market weakness
and higher volatility. With both core and overall inflation
hovering
around the tame 2% level and GDP growth for the
second quarter of 2007 coming in at a stronger
than expected 3.4%, it appears that the Federal
Reserve is going to leave interest rates untouched and
not heed calls from the housing/mortgage sector for
a drop in interest rates. In this environment I am staying
away from bonds, hedging risks through options and anchoring
my portfolio with consumer staples and dividend paying
stocks.
After giving up a lot
of ground in recent weeks, shares of Gymboree rallied
on news that the company has raised earnings expectations
from a range of 10 to 12 cents to a range of 13 to 15
cents a share. The company also initiated
a new $50 million share buyback program upon completion
of its previous $50 million buyback. These buybacks
account for almost 8% of the company's market cap and
is an excellent tax-free method for management to return
value to shareholders. The recent performance
of Gymboree is all the more remarkable when you consider
the performance of competitors Carter's (CRI)
and Children's Place (PLCE)
who lost 18.39% and 33.95% of their value in July.
As some of you may recollect, I decided
to stay away from Carter's because of lackluster
sales at its OshKosh division. Carter's swung to a loss
of $2.48 per share in the second quarter largely because
of hefty charges related to the value of its OshKosh
division and same store sales declining as much as 10%
at OshKosh. The company also lowered
its outlook for the rest of the year. Children's
Place suffered after it reported June same store sales
fell 3% at its Disney stores and 4% at its Children's
Place stores. The company is now predicting huge second
quarter losses.
Source: Yahoo Finance
It appears that our July
pick BlockBuster (BBI)
has gained an upper hand in its war with rival Netflix
(NFLX).
The company reported adding 600,000 subscribers
for its DVD subscription service in the second quarter
when compared to a drop of 55,000 subscribers
at Netflix. Netflix lowered its subscription
rates in response and as this
article points out, the clear winner in this battle
is the consumer. BlockBuster has been volatile oscillating
up and down before ending the month with a loss of 6.54%
in our portfolio. The turnaround at BlockBuster is going
to take a while but I like the growth in subscribers,
the closing of underperforming stores and the potential
of the small
store concept that the company is considering. The
company is also considering kiosks and hence attempting
to address competition at all levels. Instead of building
its own kiosks, the company should look closely into
California based DVDPlay,
which already has a footprint of well over 1,000 kiosks
in grocery stores and other locations.
Specialty travel company Ambassadors Group (EPAX), which made the cut in March 2007 reported impressive results when it posted second quarter revenue growth of 22% to
$42.9 million (the company refers to revenues as gross margins) and earnings growth of 22% to $20.9 million or $1.05 per share, above analyst estimates of $1.00 per share
in earnings and $40.2 million in revenue. Available cash on hand is $33.7 million and the company has no debt. The stock reacted favorably to these results and was up 13.73% in the week following the results and is up over 30% since we added it to our portfolio in March.
Ambassadors Group has been an amazing story since it was spun off from its parent Ambassadors International (AMIE) back in 2002 and has gained over 600% in the last five years.
Gold reversed course by
gaining $19.7 or 3.04% to close the month of July at
$667.20 per troy ounce. Contrary to what you might expect,
most of these gains came in the first three weeks of
July and the glittering metal barely reacted when the
stock market dropped last week.
Portfolio Readjustment:
The financial sector has
been a DOG this year falling 6.6% year-to-date (as of
last week) when compared to a gain of 9.6% for the S&P
500 over the same time period as you can see from this
post on Bespoke. While there have been a lot of
factors that caused this underperformance, the key risk
that has been on everyone's mind is the exposure the
sector has to the falling housing market. After 17 consecutive
interest rate hikes, spreads on loans (the bread and
butter of banks) are also lower. Despite very attractive
valuations and equally attractive dividend yields, I
have tried to steer clear of the sector with the exception
of Barclays (BCS)
and WisdomTree (WSDT.PK).
I picked both these companies back
in December 2006 because of their focus on exchange
traded funds (ETFs).
A lot has changed with
Barclays since then. The company launched a bid to acquire
Dutch bank ABN Amro (ABN),
which appeared to be a great idea at the time until
the Royal Bank of Scotland decided to spoil the party
by launching a rival bid. Beyond this costly acquisition
battle, Barclays also had exposure to now bankrupt mortgage
lender New Century Financial (NEW)
through $900 million in loans. The company was unfortunate
enough to lose
$400 million through its investment in the two Bear
Sterns hedge funds that nearly
went bust last month. To make things worse, Barclays
even has exposure to American Home Mortgage (AHM),
which lost 90% of its market value
on Tuesday after
reporting that it may have to sell off its assets
and will no longer be able to make new loans. Based
on these developments, I am going to sell our position
in Barclays for a small gain of 3.22%. Subscribers probably
made a little more on Barclays over the same time period
thanks to its high dividend yield. I am glad we did
not suffer the same loss with Barclays as the rest of
the financial sector.
Embraer
(ERJ)
$43.53
The Story:
One of the most successful
investors and the second (now third?) richest man in
the world Warren Buffett did not mince words when expressing
his thoughts about investing in airlines companies and
had this to say,
If
a capitalist had been present at Kittyhawk back
in the early 1900s, he should have shot Orville
Wright. He would have saved his progeny money.
But seriously, the airline business has been
extraordinary. It has eaten up capital over
the past century like almost no other business
because people seem to keep coming back to it
and putting fresh money in.
You've got huge fixed costs, you've got
strong labor unions and you've got commodity
pricing. That is not a great recipe for success.
I have an 800 (free call) number now that I
call if I get the urge to buy an airline stock.
I call at two in the morning and I say: “My
name is Warren and I'm an aeroholic.” And then
they talk me down.” |
Sure there are exceptions
to this rule such as Southwest Airlines (LUV),
SkyWest (SKYW)
and British Airways (BAIRY.PK)
but this general rule of thumb has been pretty much
accurate. Have the companies that actually supply aircraft
to airlines companies fared any better? When you look
at a 5 year chart of Boeing and Airbus parent EADS,
you realize that the very competition that hurts the
airlines proves highly beneficial to the aircraft makers
as it translates into new orders. Despite being plagued
by delays in releasing its A380 "super jumbo"
plane, the stock of EADS is still up over the last five
years, a period of time defined by bankruptcies of many
US airline companies. The only airline companies that
have done well recently are small domestic airlines
in emerging countries or large ones that cater to international
long haul traffic.
| Instead of investing in risky, capital
intensive and often difficult to obtain small international
airline stocks, investors could instead choose to
invest in aircraft companies like Brazil based Embraer
that happens to be in one of the BRIC (Brazil, Russia,
India and China) nations and primarily satisfies
the need for small and regional jets with 30 to
120 seats. The kind that I tend to fly a lot. Embraer
also makes executive jets such as the Legacy 600
and has recently started moving into the red-hot
ultra-light jet market with its Phenom series, the
smallest of which the Phenom
100 is priced at just $2.98 million. |
 |
Embraer does not appear
to be content by catering to these two segments and
has bigger plans for the future by building larger planes
that can compete with offerings from Boeing and Airbus.
There is certainly a lot of execution risk in this strategy
but I do not expect the company to attempt anything
on the scale of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner or the Airbus
A380. I would expect Embraer to focus on the small end
of the large airplane segment like the highly popular
Boeing 737. To get a glimpse into just how hot this
segment of the market is, check out this story titled
Stocks,
bonds... or jets in Fortune magazine that details
how difficult it is to get hold of a 737 and how hedge
funds and private equity firms are getting in on the
action.
Embraer currently gets
a majority of its business from North America but is
looking Eastward for growth from countries like India
and China. In addition to the incumbent state-owned
airlines like Air India and Indian Airlines, the airline
industry in India has been booming over the last few
years with various new entrants such as Damania (now
defunct), Kingfisher, Jet Airways and Air Deccan. This
increased competition has led to a wave of mergers recently
with Air India merging with Indian Airlines, Jet Airways
acquiring Air Sahara for $300 million and Kingfisher
Airlines attempting to acquire Air Deccan. However as
many observers have noted, this consolidation may be
a little premature as the airline industry in India
is expected to experience tremendous growth in the future.
A burgeoning middle class and rising salaries will shift
some traffic from Indian Railways, which is currently
the primary means of domestic travel to airlines, which
have reduced fares to a point where they are within
the reach of the middle class. Embraer is slowly beginning
to make inroads into the Indian market though regional
discount carriers like Paramount
Airways.
The story is similar in
countries such as China that are experiencing similar
trends. Embraer and China Aviation Industry Corporation
(AVIC) created a joint venture called Harbin Embraer
Aircraft Industry (HEAI) in 2002 to manufacture Embraer
jets locally in China to meet domestic demand. Embraer
received a large order of 100 regional jets in September
2006 from China’s Hainan Airlines for $2.7 billion.
Embraer did see some shifting
in its order backlog recently when JetBlue decided to
delay delivery of 16 Embraer 190 jets from 2013 to 2015.
However the pipeline for the company look very strong
with an order backlog of $15.6 billion as of the second
quarter of 2007. Embraer has been lagging the Brazilian
Bovespa index year-to-date but as you can see from this
glimpse into the future the company provided in
November 2006, the company expects to fly high for years
to come.
Note: If you adhere to the principles
of socially
responsible investing, please note that Embraer
derives 5.9% of its revenue from defense aviation.
Competitors:
As the third largest aircraft
maker in the world, Embraer faces competition from industry
behemoths Boeing (BA)
and Airbus as it attempts to build higher capacity planes.
Embraer also faces direct competition from the CRJ line
of commercial jets from Bombardier as well as the plethora
of companies like General Dynamics (GD)
(maker of the popular Gulfstream jets), Textron (TXT)
(maker of the Cessna Mustang) and privately held Eclipse
that are active in the light jet sector.
The Numbers:
At 32 times earnings, Embraer may appear to be pricey
until your consider the order pipeline and the fact
that this company is selling for less than 12 times
2008 earnings. The PEG (Price/Earnings/Growth) ratio
is a low 1.02. The company has over $2 billion in cash
and short term investments on its balance sheet and
$893.8 million in current/short term debt.
After posting double digit sales and earnings growth
from 2003 to 2005, both sales and earnings declined
in 2006. This drop was on account of production issues
related to wing assemblies that lead to a delay in the
delivery of 15 airplanes that were originally slated
to be delivered in 2006. For further details, including
a month to month breakout of events, check out the very
well put together and easy to navigate 2006
annual report.
| P/S |
2.04 |
Cash and Investments |
$3.44 billion |
| P/E |
32.17 |
Short and Long Term Debt |
$2.185 billion |
Instead of featuring a second stock in the newsletter,
I plan to monitor the market and if anything interesting
shows up, I will post a portfolio update on the blog
just like I did for the Apple strangle in July.
Every month we add featured stocks into a model portfolio
started with a cash position of $100,000 on August 2,
2005. To keep calculations simple, trading costs and
regular dividends are not included. Prices reflect the
closing price as of the last trading day of the previous
month. However as this newsletter was delayed by a day,
it represents the closing price as of August 1, 2007.
Model Portfolio - August 1, 2007
Stocks
| Stock |
Number of Shares |
Cost |
Current Value |
Diff ($) |
Diff (%) |
Date Added |
| ERJ |
200@43.53/share |
$8,706 |
$8,706 |
$0 |
0% |
8/1/2007 |
| BBI |
1,500@4.59/share |
$6,885 |
$6,570 |
$-315
|
-4.58% |
7/9/2007 |
| GYMB |
200@42.02/share |
$8,404 |
$8,636 |
$232 |
2.76% |
6/14/2007 |
| UL |
200@32.53/share |
$6,506 |
$6,182 |
$-324 |
-4.98% |
5/11/2007 |
| EMC |
600@13.85/share |
$8,310 |
$11,454 |
$3,144 |
37.83% |
3/31/2007 |
| EPAX |
300@29.70/share |
$8,910 |
$11,682 |
$2,772 |
31.11% |
2/28/2007 |
| ICLR |
250@37.30/share |
$9,325 |
$11,752 |
$2,428 |
26.03% |
1/31/2007 |
| DO |
80@76.65/share |
$6,132 |
$8,133 |
$2,001 |
32.63% |
1/3/2007 |
| ALVR |
1000@6.87/share |
$6,870 |
$10,820 |
$3,950 |
57.5% |
1/3/2007 |
| WSDT.PK |
1000@7.40/share |
$7,400 |
$4,700 |
$-2,700 |
-36.49% |
11/30/2006 |
| SNDK |
200@48.10/share |
$9,620 |
$10,638 |
$1,018 |
10.58% |
10/31/2006 |
| TEVA |
300@35.05/share |
$10,515 |
$12,780 |
$2,265 |
21.54% |
9/1/2006 |
| STP |
400@25.93/share |
$10,372 |
$16,064 |
$5,692 |
54.88% |
7/31/2006 |
| PG |
180@55.60/share |
$10,008 |
$11,369 |
$1,361 |
13.6% |
6/30/2006 |
| LOGI |
240@20.385/share |
$4,894 |
$6,511 |
$1,618 |
33.06% |
5/31/2006 |
| JNJ |
200@57.65/share |
$11,530 |
$12,192 |
$662 |
5.74% |
2/28/2006 |
| MED |
1000@6.955/share |
$6,955 |
$7,320 |
$365 |
5.25% |
11/30/2005 |
| TTM |
900@11.94/share |
$10,746 |
$15,273 |
$4,527 |
42.13% |
11/30/2005 |
| AIRN |
1700@5.62/share |
$9,554 |
$5,491 |
$-4,063 |
-42.53% |
8/1/2005 |
Options
| Option |
Number of Units |
Cost |
Current Value |
Diff ($) |
Diff (%) |
Date Added |
| JOEMJ.X |
3@7.00/contract |
$2,100 |
$3,300 |
$1,200 |
57.14%
|
10/31/2006 |
| YUXMG.X |
8@2.60/contract |
$2,080 |
$3,712 |
$1,632 |
78.46%
|
10/31/2006 |
| Cash |
|
|
$12,394 |
|
|
|
| Total |
|
|
$205,680 |
$105,680 |
105.68% |
|
Voluntary Disclosure: I currently
own shares of Airspan Networks (AIRN),
Medifast (MED),
Tata Motors (TTM),
Logitech (LOGI),
Suntech Power (STP),
Teva (TEVA),
Mattel (MAT),
SanDisk (SNDK),
Alvarion (ALVR),
WisdomTree (WSDT.PK),
Unilever (UL),
Gymboree (GYMB)
and BlockBuster (BBI).
|