SINLetter - July
2007
Welcome to edition 24
of Suria Investment Newsletter (SINLetter), a free monthly
investment newsletter. The objective of this newsletter
is to provide you with unbiased initial research and
basic facts about individual stocks and other financial
instruments so that you can research them further before
deciding to add them to your portfolio or not. If you
are reading this and are not a subscriber, you can subscribe
by going to www.sinletter.com/subscribe.aspx
and you will start receiving this newsletter from next
month. I have provided relevant links throughout this
newsletter, but if you have any questions or comments,
feel free to write
to me.
June
Blog and Forum Entries:
While the forums were
relatively quite in June, the blog was more active and
given below are some of the blog and forum entries in
case you missed them.
If you would like to post to the forums and do not
have your password, you can use the Request
Your Password link from the Login
page. If you do not receive blog entries by email,
you can still subscribe to receive
blog entries by email here.
New
Watchlist:
In our quest to improve
and expand SINLetter, we have created a new feature
called Watchlist
that will allow me to share with you stocks that I am
in the process of analyzing for future editions of SINLetter.
I have been doing something similar with the Stocks
That Almost Made The Cut blog entries but this feature
will provide a bird's eye view of all the stocks on
my watch list.
A subscriber wrote to
me in late April asking about the stocks that I was
looking into at that time. I told him that I was analyzing
the baby clothing wholesaler Carter's (CRI),
the investment bank Thomas Weisel Partners Group (TWPG)
and the alternative energy company Hoku Scientific (HOKU).
While Thomas Weisel has declined a little since then
and Carter's has gone up a little, Hoku has posted a
gain of more than 80% in less than three months after
announcing a 10 year contract to supply polysilicon
to SINLetter pick Suntech
Power (STP).
Hopefully I can unearth other Hokus in the future and
the watchlist will be an early alert mechanism for subscribers.
Every time I add or remove
a stock from the watchlist, you will receive an email
since SINLetter subscribers are automatically subscribed
to the watchlist. You can manage your subscriptions
to the newsletters, blog entries and watchlist from
a central location after logging
into SINLetter using your email address and your
password. If you do not know your password, you can
retrieve it by using the forgot
password link.
Portfolio Performance:
It gives me great pleasure
to see the SINLetter model portfolio more than double
in the span of less than two years. As of market
close on July 9, 2007, the portfolio is registering
gains of 100.54% since its August 2005 inception.
The monthly, quarterly and "since inception"
performance is tabulated below. The since inception
numbers in this table are as of June 30, 2007 since
this newsletter was delayed by a week thanks to my mini-vacation
to the Pacific Northwest.
| Performance Metric |
Dow |
S&P 500 |
Nasdaq |
SINLetter |
| June 2007 |
-1.61% |
-1.78% |
-0.05% |
1.5% |
| Second Quarter 2007 |
8.53% |
5.81% |
7.50% |
3.60% |
| Since Inception (Aug 2005) |
26.22% |
21.69% |
18.58% |
97.45% |
Our growth stocks SanDisk
(SNDK)
and Suntech
Power (STP)
had an outstanding June and the first week of July has
also been kind to them. SanDisk benefited from increased
demand for flash memory and improved
pricing for NAND flash, which was under pressure
earlier this year due to too much supply. The 64 Gbit
Samsung NAND flash chip in the new
Apple iPhone may be contributing to the demand for
NAND flash and hence the 5.4% increase in flash prices
last week. SanDisk is now firmly in positive territory
in the model portfolio with a gain of 6.53% and I am
glad I stuck with the stock despite a drop of almost
25% after I added it to the portfolio in November 2006.
Shares of WiMax and Wi-Fi
equipment provider Airspan Networks (AIRN)
have taken a hard hit in recent months making it the
worst performer of the SINLetter model portfolio after
having lost almost half of its value. Hedging
our WiMax bet with competitor Alvarion (ALVR),
which is now posting a gain of 42.5% in the portfolio,
has certainly helped reduced the sting of the Airspan
loss but the pain still exists. Airspan lost a lot of
ground in a hurry recently after the company announced
that second quarter revenue is going to come in at $22.5
million, well below its earlier forecast of $27 to $30
million.
If the company can maintain
its 30% gross margins (the margins should be higher
due to low sales of traditional low margin wireless
products) and has flat SG&A expenses, the loss in
the second quarter would be in the range of $8 to $9
million. With almost $29 million in cash and investments
on the balance sheet at the start of the quarter, the
company will not have to raise additional capital at
least until mid-2008 even at this higher rate of cash
burn. If the company cannot show improved sales of WiMax
products over the next six months and turn profitable
in 2008 as analysts expect, it will be time to sell
Airspan and move on.
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ),
announced a massive $10
billion buyback today but the stock basically yawned at the news and barely appreciated
1% in response. With a market cap of $181.67 billion, this buyback (if it happens) only works out to 5.5% of the total outstanding shares.
After performing well through most of
2006, the stock has seriously lagged the market this
year despite the fact that Warren Buffett continues to accumulate Johnson & Johnson.
I like the defensive position this stock provides to the model portfolio, the above average 2.7% dividend yield, the current valuation and the
decision by the company to acquire Pfizer's (PFE) consumer products portfolio, which includes Listerine, Neosporin, Band-Aid and
Acuvue contact lenses among many other well recognized brands. If you are still not convinced about the wisdom of retaining Johnson & Johnson in
the portfolio, check out this outstanding blog entry about the company's intrinsic value by Joe Ponzio of FwallStreet.com.
Gold had another losing
month, dropping to close the month of June at $647.50
per troy ounce, a loss of $13.10 or 1.98%. This comes
on the heels of a 2.85% drop in May. The first week
of July has helped the glittering metal recoup some
of its May and June losses.
Portfolio Readjustment:
I would prefer to leave
the model portfolio untouched at this point but have
to make adjustments to make room for our new pick. I
am going to sell the second half of our position in
Mattel (MAT)
and register a gain of 30.15% in little over 9 months.
I still like the long-term prospects of this dividend
yielding toy maker and plan on retaining it in my personal
portfolio just like I did with other SINLetter model
portfolio alumni like Royal Philips (PHG),
Intel (INTC),
Nokia (NOK),
Pfizer (PFE)
and CMGI (CMGI).
Performance
of the Ten Stocks For 2007:
The ten
stocks for 2007 that I picked in December 2006 have
outperformed all the major indices during the first
half of the year with six gainers and four losers. Amgen
(AMGN)
continues to suffer under the weight of unsuccessful
trials for its cancer and anemia drugs, Nautilus
(NLS)
has been hurt by the slowing housing market and Barclays
(BCS)
has been hurt by Royal Bank of Scotland's $95.5 billion
rival bid for Dutch bank ABN Amro (ABN).
With the exception of
Banco Santander Chile (SAN),
all the other gainers posted double digit gains, helping
the group post a gain of 10.4% for the year. These gains
do not include any regular dividends or the $4 per share
special dividend by Diamond Offshore Drilling (DO).
Oddly enough, even though Banco Santander Chile
(SAN)
has better margins, faster revenue growth, a higher
dividend yield and a more attractive valuation than
rival Banco de Chile (BCH),
the stock did not even budge in response to the recent
"strategic alliance" talks between Banco
de Chile and Citigroup (C).
Ten Stocks for 2007
| Company Name |
Symbol |
Price Then* |
Price Now** |
% Change |
|
Amgen
|
AMGN
|
$68.31
|
$55.29 |
-19.06% |
|
Diamond Offshore
|
DO
|
$79.94
|
$101.56 |
27.04% |
|
Landec
|
LNDC
|
$10.76
|
$13.40 |
24.53% |
|
Nautilus
|
NLS
|
$14.00
|
$12.04 |
-14% |
|
Airspan Networks
|
AIRN
|
$3.70
|
$3.63 |
-1.89% |
|
Barclays Bank
|
BCS
|
$58.14
|
$55.79 |
-4.04% |
|
Teva Pharmaceutical
|
TEVA
|
$31.08
|
$41.25 |
32.72% |
|
Embraer
|
ERJ
|
$41.43
|
$48.21 |
16.36% |
|
Banco Santander Chile
|
SAN
|
$48.16
|
$49.54 |
3.55%
|
|
Alvarion
|
ALVR
|
$6.72
|
$9.33 |
38.84% |
| Total Returns
Excluding Dividends |
10.4% |
* Price as of market close on Dec 29th, 2006
** Price as of market close on June 29th, 2007
Performance of the Ten Stocks for 2007 Vs Major
Indices
|
Ten Stocks For 2007
|
10.4%
|
| Dow Jones Industrial Average |
7.59% |
| S&P 500 |
6.00% |
| Nasdaq |
7.78% |
| Russell 2000 |
5.84% |
Vote
For SINLetter:
SINLetter has in the past
made it into top financial blogs lists such as the one
complied
by TheStreet.com columnist, entrepreneur and hedge
fund manager James Altucher and the Top
60 Finance Blogs list put together by Valuewiki.
SINLetter was recently nominated for the Blogger's
Choice Awards under the Best
Business Blog category and already has a few votes.
The exposure from getting to the top (or near the top)
of this list would be enormous. So please share your
love by spending a couple of minutes to register and
vote for my blog by clicking on the image below. I hope
I get a chance to wake up tomorrow and see a healthy
number of votes.
If just a handful
of you were to vote for SINLetter, it would become the
top rated business blog overnight on Blogger's
Choice Awards.
Management Changes and Turnarounds:
If there is one criteria
that I do not pay enough attention
to while analyzing new opportunities, it is the management
of the company. Most investors would consider this a
serious flaw as the quality of management is one of
the most important factors that determines the success
or failure of the company and eventually your investment.
It is widely known that most venture capitalists and
angel investors invest in people rather than ideas or
inventions. Ideas are a dime a dozen and even I come
up with about half a dozen each year (SINLetter and
MustFeed.com were two of these ideas). It is the execution
of ideas that separates winners from losers. So why
do I pay very little attention (I do glance at management
pay) to such an important criteria?
There are two reasons
for this. The importance of a good management team is
well recognized by investors and especially Wall Street
analysts, who for the most part are in close contact
with management. Hence the impact of the management
team has already been thoroughly explored and priced
into the stock.
The second reason for
my apathy towards the management team has to do with
the time it would take to dig up the history of each
member of the management team and figure out the dynamics
of the team for each company analyzed. Retail investors
also do not have the same access to management that
analysts and institutional investors do. An alternative
approach for retail investors would be to look at readily
available statistics that measure management effectiveness
such as Return
on Assets (ROA), Return
on Equity (ROE), earnings growth and sales growth
over the last few years.
Investors usually look
for a "catalyst" that could make the price
of the stock move in either direction. One such catalyst
that relates to management that I do
pay attention to is a change in upper management, especially
at a company that is struggling. A fellow newsletter
editor whom I respect a lot, tends to primarily invest
in companies where management has recently changed.
While he does not explicitly state this on his website
or in his research, you can easily arrive at this conclusion
after following some of his picks. Oddly enough, in
his experience, the companies in his portfolio where
he had maximum contact with management turned out to
be laggards. Is it possible that close contact
with management hinders the stoic detachment with which
one is supposed to treat his or her investments?
Management changes at
struggling or turnaround companies, usually causes the
price of the stock to jump as I noticed in potential
turnaround situations like Six Flags (SIX)
and Ford (F).
Often these management changes are prompted by hedge
funds or activist investors. According to a academic
research paper titled "Hedge Fund Activism,
Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. Turnarounds",
this jump (usually 5 to 7%) is not temporary and persists
for 12 months after a hedge fund announces their involvement
in a company. One key drawback of this study is that
it looks at events over a very short period of time
from 2001 to 2005.
Based on this study and
personal experience with turnaround situations, I have
noticed that investing in a struggling company with
a recent change in management is a highly risky strategy
but can generate some outstanding gains if you have
done your homework.
Blockbuster
(BBI)
$4.59
I was originally planning
on featuring two merger
arbitrage opportunities for this edition of SINLetter
and adding Blockbuster (BBI)
to the watchlist but then noticed an announcement about
a change
in management at Blockbuster last week. This catalyst
along with an experience during my recent vacation lead
me to make a last minute change and feature Blockbuster
instead.
As most of you are aware,
the rise of the DVD rental by mail model that Netflix
(NFLX)
perfected has had a dramatic negative effect on the
bottom line of both Blockbuster and Movie Gallery (MOVI),
the parent of Hollywood Video and Game Crazy. While
Movie Gallery has headed into penny stock territory
and is considering selling itself, Blockbuster has attempted
to fight back by closing underperforming stores and
launching its own rival DVD rental by mail service called
"Blockbuster By Mail". Blockbuster also went
one step further and launched a service called "Blockbuster
Total Access" that allows subscribers to receive
rentals by mails and send them back by mail or exchange
it for a new rental at a neighborhood store. Despite
having a Netflix membership, I would sometimes rent
movies from a DVDPlay kiosk at Safeway (SWY)
because my Netflix movies were "in transit"
when I wanted to watch something. I have been reluctant
to switch from Netflix to Blockbuster even though the
Blockbuster service is cheaper and the in-store rental
exchange option is very appealing to me.
The primary reason for
my reluctance to switch has been the breath of Netflix's
DVD catalog. While talking to some friends who currently
use the Blockbuster service, I was surprised to learn
that they found most of the movies they wanted to watch
through Blockbuster's online rental service. I decided
to do a comparison to see if I could find the 64 movies
in my Netflix queue on Blockbuster and was surprised
to find that Blockbuster had all but 4 of those titles.
The expansion of Blockbuster's catalog to 70,000 titles
might explain why I was able to find an Indian movie
released in 1974 as well as a British television series
released in 1977. Netflix currently has 80,000 titles.
Given this improvement
in Blockbuster's online service, the involvement of
activist investor Carl Icahn (who was recently featured
in a Fortune magazine story called The
hottest investor in America) and the appointment
of former 7-Eleven Chief Executive James Keyes as its
chairman and CEO, Blockbuster is beginning to look like
a story that might have a happy ending while providing
all the thrills of a turnaround stock. The parallels
between Blockbuster and another turnaround story Wild
Oats (OATS)
are striking. Both companies have activist investors
(Ron Burkle in the case of OATS), both companies embarked
upon a strategy of closing underperforming stores and
both of them also have similar total debt/equity ratios.
I used to consult for the natural food industry and
seriously considered investing in Wild Oats at about
$8 in early 2005 but missed the turnaround and the subsequent
100% appreciation in its stock price.
Revenues at Blockbuster
have been slowly rising over the last four quarters
but the company remains unprofitable and faces
many risks. While Blockbuster now has a game
plan to compete against Netflix using the Blockbuster
Total Access service, Netflix has already moved on to
offering free movie downloads to its subscribers. Netflix
now has about 2,000 titles for online download and another
competitor Vongo.com
has a similar number of titles available for online
downloads at a low price of just $9.99 per month. I
personally prefer DVDs to online downloads and I am
sure a majority of current movie watchers have the same
preference. However movie downloads are the future and
Blockbusters has no choice but to move in that direction
by acquiring a company like Vongo.com
or building its own download service. If Blockbuster
decides to build its own download service, this unprofitable
company will have to spend even more money on its money
losing online division. The company happens to have
almost a billion dollars of debt on its balance sheet
and capital to acquire other companies would be hard
to come by.
However with the new CEO,
I expect improved retail focus and I am encouraged by
the subscriber growth at Blockbuster in the face of
failed atempts by companies like Wal-Mart and even Amazon
to capture the online DVD rental market. Blockbuster
happens to be selling for 16 cents per dollar of sales
(a Price/Sales ratio of 0.16) and if there is even a
hint of the company becoming profitable again, the stock,
which has fallen from $26 in 2002 to the current $4.59,
is likely to see significant gains.
Did I mention that turnaround
situations are risky (just ask investors of Gateway
(GTW)
or Imax (IMAX)
who are still waiting for a turnaround) and the company
may just as easily go bankrupt. Blockbuster may be best
suited for investors who have an healthy appetite for
contrarian bets and/or have a diversified portfolio
that is anchored by core holdings like Johnson &
Johnson (JNJ)
and Procter & Gamble (PG).
Competitors:
Blockbuster faces stiff
competition from a plethora of competitors including
Movie Gallery (MOVI),
Netflix (NFLX),
online download services like Vongo.com,
Cinemanow.com
and Amazon.com's (AMZN)
Unbox
as well as DVD kiosk companies like DVDPlay
and Redbox.
Redbox is a division of Coinstar (CSTR), a company I
wrote about in the blog post titled Coinstar
Costs A Pretty Penny.
The Numbers:
| P/S |
0.16 |
Cash and Investments |
$182.3 million |
| P/E |
NA |
Short and Long Term Debt |
$921.1 million |
Since my original focus for this newsletter was merger
arbitrage opportunities and I decided to feature
Blockbuster at the last minute, this newsletter has
only one stock pick. I am considering a couple of other
stocks and I will post them in a Stocks
That Almost Made The Cut blog entry or
on the new watchlist.
Every month we add featured stocks into a model portfolio
started with a cash position of $100,000 on August 2,
2005. To keep calculations simple, trading costs and
regular dividends are not included. Prices reflect the
closing price as of the last trading day of the previous
month. However as this newsletter was delayed, it represents
the closing price as of July 9, 2007
Model Portfolio - July 10, 2007
Stocks
| Stock |
Number of Shares |
Cost |
Current Value |
Diff ($) |
Diff (%) |
Date Added |
| BBI |
1,500@4.59/share |
$6,885 |
$6,885 |
$0 |
0% |
7/9/2007 |
| NLS |
500@12.8/share |
$6,400 |
$6,085 |
-$315 |
-4.92% |
6/14/2007 |
| GYMB |
200@42.02/share |
$8,404 |
$8,240 |
-$164 |
-1.95% |
6/14/2007 |
| UL |
200@32.53/share |
$6,506 |
$6,498 |
-$8 |
-0.12% |
5/11/2007 |
| EMC |
600@13.85/share |
$8,310 |
$11,154 |
$2,844 |
34.22% |
3/31/2007 |
| EPAX |
300@29.70/share |
$8,910 |
$10,773 |
$1,863 |
20.91% |
2/28/2007 |
| ICLR |
250@37.30/share |
$9,325 |
$11,062 |
$1,738 |
18.63% |
1/31/2007 |
| DO |
80@76.65/share |
$6,132 |
$8,414 |
$2,282 |
37.21% |
1/3/2007 |
| ALVR |
1000@6.87/share |
$6,870 |
$9,790 |
$2,920 |
42.5% |
1/3/2007 |
| WSDT.PK |
1000@7.40/share |
$7,400 |
$4,680 |
-$2,720 |
-36.76% |
11/30/2006 |
| BCS |
200@54.06/share |
$10,812 |
$11,624 |
$812 |
7.51% |
11/30/2006 |
| SNDK |
200@48.10/share |
$9,620 |
$10,248 |
$628 |
6.53% |
10/31/2006 |
| TEVA |
300@35.05/share |
$10,515 |
$12,411 |
$1,896 |
18.03% |
9/1/2006 |
| STP |
400@25.93/share |
$10,372 |
$15,824 |
$5,452 |
52.56% |
7/31/2006 |
| PG |
180@55.60/share |
$10,008 |
$11,074 |
$1,066 |
10.65% |
6/30/2006 |
| LOGI |
240@20.385/share |
$4,893 |
$6,720 |
$1,826 |
37.32% |
5/31/2006 |
| JNJ |
200@57.65/share |
$11,530 |
$12,544 |
$1,014 |
8.79% |
2/28/2006 |
| MED |
1000@6.955/share |
$6,955 |
$8,670 |
$1,715 |
24.66% |
11/30/2005 |
| TTM |
900@11.94/share |
$10,746 |
$15,957 |
$5,211 |
48.49% |
11/30/2005 |
| AIRN |
1700@5.62/share |
$9,554 |
$5,236 |
-$4,318 |
-45.20% |
8/1/2005 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
| Option |
Number of Units |
Cost |
Current Value |
Diff ($) |
Diff (%) |
Date Added |
| CFCSH.X |
8@2.46/contract |
$1,968 |
$2,320 |
$352 |
17.89% |
1/3/2007 |
| LRXMJ.X |
3@7.00/contract |
$2,100 |
$1,650 |
-$450 |
-21.43% |
10/31/2006 |
| YBQMG.X |
8@2.60/contract |
$2,080 |
$1,592 |
-$488 |
-23.46% |
10/31/2006 |
| Cash |
|
|
$1,086 |
|
|
|
| Total |
|
|
$200,537 |
$100,537 |
100.54% |
|
Voluntary Disclosure: I currently
own shares of Airspan Networks (AIRN),
Medifast (MED),
Tata Motors (TTM),
Logitech (LOGI),
Suntech Power (STP),
Teva (TEVA),
Mattel (MAT),
SanDisk (SNDK),
Alvarion (ALVR),
WisdomTree (WSDT.PK),
Unilever (UL),
Gymboree (GYMB)
and Nautilus (NLS)
as well as put options on Countrywide Financial (CFC)
and YRC Worldwide (YRCW).
|